<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Alberta Bubble Blog - Latest Comments in More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubbleblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://albertabubbleblog.disqus.com/more_on_natural_gas/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:07:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20240245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another example of why the dinosaurs are going to have to change their thinking. By dinosaurs I mean the "Peak Oil" theorists and all of those who believe that Oil is the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/oct2009/gb20091016_587060.htm?campaign_id=yhoo" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/oct2009/gb20091016_587060.htm?campaign_id=yhoo"&gt;Germany's Coming Energy Revolution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jsan33</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:07:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20239832</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple of interesting articles&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/33341496" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cnbc.com/id/33341496"&gt;Recession Will Be 'Full-Blown Depression': Strategist &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;br&gt;This article sort of goes in hand with some other articles I've read lately about some of the new all electric vehicles that will be coming out by the major manufacturers. Some of them are very cool and my guess is we are at the beginning of  the electric car revolution.  Most of them are touting at least 160 Km driving range between charges. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-perfect-storms-brewing-to-cool-petroleum-demand-2009-10-16" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-perfect-storms-brewing-to-cool-petroleum-demand-2009-10-16"&gt;A perfect storm's brewing to cool petroleum demand &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jsan33</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:52:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20229567</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't understand how an imaginary link between two positive statistics makes CREB look bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BearClaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:25:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20223809</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So why does the Globe and Mail keep running big letter headlines about how real estate is a bull market all over again?  Must be weighted to Vancouver.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nonplused</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:26:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20185910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Deleted&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Totalmotorcycle</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:15:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20185885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;CREB kind of shoots itself in the foot here on the big headline of "18% increase in sales". Why? We have record low inventory thus getting 18% sales is not that great of an achievement in that context. If we have normal inventory (say x2 what it is now) then it would have been a small increase in sales.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mike&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Totalmotorcycle</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:13:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20145458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Home resales up 18% in the 3rd quarter. Seems like the record low mortgage rates worked wonders. I hope those who bought at low rates are not scraping by on making just their mthly mortgage pymts and are actually paying down principal faster. Further, I hope these people realize that low rates now do not mean low rates for 5 yrs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, the CREA release points to the fact that inventory has declined steadily. Builders are leaving the market and are building less. The supply has been constricted since the recession started.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The biggest play left in the RE market over the next few yrs is the behaviour of those baby boomers who were considering retirement. If they decide to cash out en force from the current stock market jump and to downsize I think we could be seeing a lot of RE being made available in the next few yrs. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:26:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20126532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone watch "Special Ed" last night on TV........he's such a  bohunk.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope Danielle Smith wins the Wild Rose leadership this weekend.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carioca Canuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:37:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20076674</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alberta ain't finished quite yet....Here is a great example that horizontal multi-stage fracing can be used in more places than just BC Montney Shale's and Southern Sask Bakken's. Imagine getting  a 15% ROI at $3.50 AECO (Alberta Price) natural gas even without the Alberta Royalty credit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;As an example he cites Fairborne's play in the Wilrich formation at Marlboro, northeast of Edson in northwestern Alberta where the company is drilling its third horizontal well.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Fairborne's first Wilrich well came on at more than four mmcf a day, and was still producing more than three mmcf a day after four months. A Wilrich horizontal well has a 10-15% rate of return at an AECO price of $3.50 per gigajoule, VanSickle said. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nickles.com/ntm/extra.asp?article=NTM2009_OD0000.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nickles.com/ntm/extra.asp?article=NTM2009_OD0000.html"&gt;http://www.nickles.com/ntm/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mr Happy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:23:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20067939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Article on the front page of the Edmonton Journal today reads "year over year decline in Edmonton single family homes of 11.4% from August 2008 to August 2009.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interesting trend. Where to now?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mr. Ed .M. Onton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:07:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20063880</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I think the overriding cause of the gas price collapse has been the collapse of the US economy.  About half of gas demand is devived from manufacturing and chemical production.  That stuff is all off hard.  It isn't an influx of shale gas that is causing it, at least shale gas is not the main cause although it may be a driver.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We get a new "unlimited" supply of energy every few years, and they never materialize, so I'm not going to write off the Alberta oil patch just yet.  However, if this economic collapse keeps getting worse (which it is, despite the retoric from Washington), who knows how low gas prices can go?  It will take a while for drilling stand-downs to rebalance the market.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nonplused</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:58:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20060006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DISCLAIMER: I know NOTHING about the economics of oil/shale/gas/environmental emission business........but........I do know that the left wing in both Canada and the US, as well as the rest of world has tremendous hate on for anything to do with "big oil", automobiles and the internal compustion engine, et al. They see them as the prime symbols of corporate excess gone mad, greed, money, environomental danger,  the ability to be independant and individualistic, etc.....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These are just some of the main things that your typical beret wearing communist MF'er sitting in some dank and dark Parisian basement whilst reading Marx by candlelight has come to hate, as they go against all the tenets of their warped and totally fucked up belief system.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At any cost they will avoid, deter and derail efforts to make this kind of energy source truly green friendly. Cars today are 1/1000 better emission wise than cars of 50 years ago. The morons that run "Kalimexiforniastan" are stumped because everytime they pass a green law that they think will impune the automobiles prgoress, the manufacturer's beat them at their own game by designed theri way ouf ot the problem. Technology has not yet been pushed to see what can be done with the shale problem Mr. Happy postedabout, nor some of the other things, instead, and for example, nutbars like Michael Ignatieff, the liberal leader, want to invest billions in only green technology, "but",  as the whackjobs on the left see it. They are all like that........&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Don't write off cheaper natural gas or oil just yet.........&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carioca Canuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:59:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20046015</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I should have proof read that last comment a little better...  It looks like squiddly77 wrote it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mr Happy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20022875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gloria -- Can you please add this site: &lt;a href="http://albertabubbleblog.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://albertabubbleblog.blogspot.com/"&gt;http://albertabubbleblog.bl...&lt;/a&gt; to your Blog Roll?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mike&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Totalmotorcycle</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:13:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20016596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For starters the drilling techniques aren't new they have been around for 15+ years.   What's new is, first; high enough natural gas prices to allow the initial shale gas wells to be drilled and second; the production techniques, ie. Multi-stage fracing, which I give ya is fairly new, only been around for around 5 years.  Fracing as  in single stage fracing has been around for 20+ years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is just one kink in the armour though and that's they think that they can can be profitable at $4.00 or $5.00 US nat gas prices.  They are basing this on estimated ultimate recoverable (EUR) rates.  They are hoping that those prices will be sufficient to pay off the initial investment, ongoing operating  costs and still give them a 15% return on investment (ROI).  The jury is still out on this because there is not enough EUR data that backs up these wells.   So if their wrong on their EUR's estimates are not right  they will have pissed away all the capital in the last year for not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you didn't know what is currently saving all the bigger shale gas players is that they have hedged out at least 75% of their 2009 production at $7 to $9, so they only have around 25% of their production exposed to these low prices.   In 2010 the hedging will not be there so we should start seeing whether or not these wells are actually profitable at these low prices.   If the big gas companies are right and they are profitable, good for them but if they're not, you will see shale gas drilling come to a skretching halt until gas prices recover.  What the price is required will be anyone's guess but it will be a lot higher than they currently are, that's for sure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS: The big shale gas players have put together a very well funded lobby organization to target the US government and the media to increase consumption of natural gas.   They are trying very very hard to knock coal off it's top spot in the electric generation market.  Right now nat gas electricity generation is only used during peak periods, they're trying to change that to full time and  are painting coal as the green house gas boggy man.  It looks like they seem to be make some headway.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mr Happy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:01:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20011001</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We have just barely scratched the surface to the amount of recoverable shale natural gas around the world. It's MASSIVE and it is a new untapped market that is just waiting to be used.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Alberta has gone from being significant in the area of natural gas to really being insignificant. It's amazing what new drilling techniques can do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.omaha.com/article/20091013/MONEY/710139964" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.omaha.com/article/20091013/MONEY/710139964"&gt;Natural gas reserves may grow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jsan33</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:06:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20010852</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If everything you are saying here pans out to be true, you have more than home prices to worry about friend.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">worldclass</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:02:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20007931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;" It takes a lot of wells and frac-ing to keep the gas moving and the decline rates are very high."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Exactly.  The markets mindset right now is that the market is "flooded" with NG.  True to a point, but that will change as demand overcomes the supply.  Shale gas is a totally different beast and only the big majors can play in that sandbox.  As you said, it takes many many many wells and infrastructure, ALOT of water, etc.  Not to mention land and environmental negotiations that can take years to define.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bottom line is it will be years and major major!! dollar investment before any substantial shale gas volumes hit the market.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plague</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:04:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20006123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Idiot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mr Happy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:26:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-20004602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Shale Gas is going to destroy the Nat Gas industry in Alberta. When US consumers can get their own Shale for half what we want to sell ours for, there's only one to play. Make no mistake this will bankrupt the provinces books&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Price of Nat gas collapsed today. Watch our precious O and G stocks follow in the next couple of weeks then oil then the dollar then real estate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile interest rates will jack up to where they were in the 80s (23%) and you can press rewind on our house prices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This will end badly. You betcha&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sweets</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:46:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-19986950</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was thinking the same thing CC, pretty funny stuff I had to burst out laughing at just how low they would go to leech away at people's money. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">realstinkyagent</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:57:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-19986103</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Coal is a messy and dangerous thing to get out of the ground.  You either have to move the whole mountain on top of it or the mountain it's in keeps falling on your work force.  It's one of those impractical replacements for oil like tar sansds.  It sounds good in the lab but it just doesn't scale.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nonplused</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:41:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-19985948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am somewhat skeptical shale gas is going to work nearly as well as is hoped.  It takes a lot of wells and frac-ing to keep the gas moving and the decline rates are very high.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But for at least the next few years prices will be depressed by the fear of the market being swamped by shale gas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We get a new supply swamp every few years.  Last time it was LNG's.  Whatever happened to LNG's?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nonplused</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:39:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-19983053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;CC&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You think the Oilsands get a bad rap... check out this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/01/60minutes/main5356202.shtml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/01/60minutes/main5356202.shtml"&gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stor...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mr Happy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:55:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Natural Gas</title><link>http://albertabubble.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-natural-gas.html#comment-19980361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In other news.........&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Has anyone seen the new 30 second commercial tripe from The Bank of Silly Notions.......eerrrr......The Bank of Nova Scotia........?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a dark twist on the Century 21 "Suzanne knows what is best" commercial they now have their own blatantly sexist and demeaning towards women variant, designed to embarrass females into letting hubby throw all their hard earned savings away on some heavy fee earning (for the bank anyways) stupid mutual funds, ABCP garbage or other stock market investment with one of their "Scotia Advisors".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Basically, what you have is a couple sitting in front of their "Scotia Advisor" and hubby is trying to explain to wifey that the market is where the great returns are, and that they get nothing in GIC's.......etc.....(well, I wouldn't exactly call the preservation  of capital "nothing", would you ?? LOL !!) but I digress......&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyways, the rocket scientist, errrr "Scotia Advisor", (I wonder it that should have "TM" behind it like REALTOR does.......LOL !!!) says "he's right" to his wife......and hubby rips off his shirt to expose underneath that he is wearing at-shirt with HE'S RIGHT written on it and he proceeds to run around the bank screaming in victory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Classy........&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carioca Canuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:10:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>